Why we implement GetHashCode in IEqualityComparer? - jocuri-cu-fotbal.com Why we implement GetHashCode in IEqualityComparer? - jocuri-cu-fotbal.com

Iequalitycomparer equals not called dating, background

My hope was that MS updated implementation of their collection when they introduced IEq Answers GetHashCode is used in Dictionary colections and it creates hash for storing objects in it. Here I will try to explain what I got from there.

This is the case with the standard case-insensitive string comparers.

Implementing IEqualityComparer

The interface can be implemented to allow customised comparison of values and objects. The code below instantiates three customers. See here for the best generic answer I know. Distinct customComparer ; The best part about this solution is that it will work for any property and any type, so instead of writing a custom IEqualityComparer, we can just reuse our generic PropertyComparer.

In fact, we could check this by adding a debug output to Equals method: Furthermore, it is very easy to make the class generic so that it can be used for collections of objects of other types - not only for MovieActors. The thing is, in the GetHashCode method, when given a null, I'd probably want to return 0 or some other number, maybe Int This web site uses cookies.

Distinct customComparer ; This will cause the Distinct method to compare our objects based our custom Equals implementation which uses the EmailAddress property of the Contact. I hope this helps.

Implementing a generic IEqualityComparer and IComparer class | netmatze

Not doing so is wrong and will cause you pain down the road. You can implement the IEqualityComparer interface for the Dictionary collection. If anything, you would want null values in this case when compared to other null values to return false.

It computes a hash code based on a key and if another value matches it exactly, the two keys match. I do not really understand the GetHashCode method, despite reading around on the internet and what exactly it is doing.

But it still says that the file is used by another process. So our second George Clooney is in fact an independent object since it was created independently and its reference differs from the reference of the first one - therefore it appears in the output twice: It is passed to the Dictionary in the constructor.

It is a good idea to use a static instance of your IEqualityComparer. We will deal with the Distinct. Default to the one that does. Previously, the best available method for comparing equality was the virtual Object Equals method.

What's the role of GetHashCode in the IEqualityComparer in .NET? - W3Cgeek

However, I would like to push our ActorComparer a little further. In this case we'll fix the type parameter as Customer, as we won't need it to compare any other type. If not, it returns false.

Here is an implementation of such a class: Some unusual cases, not shown, may not work correctly such as trailing hyphens. This means that the comparison of the first and third customers returns false and the two objects' hash codes differ.

But this can be changed. It is essential that the hash codes for two values that are deemed equal by the Equals method are the same. This said, let's return to our ActorComparer. The Problem First, let's look at our sample Contact class: Suppose, we do something with actors of a movie: Both Person instances in this case are equal by definition of Person yet Contains fails.

Recent Posts

Only during Save button click, I should validate all controls. The code for deleting threat is on a timer the timer interval is 1and when i click on delete threat, the timer starts, the program freeze, and it says an error message that the file is used by another process.

Since there is no limit to how much information an object can contain, certain hash codes are shared by multiple objects — so the hash code is not necessarily unique.

GetHashCode is intended as a fast but rough estimate of equality, so many operations potentially involving large numbers of comparisons start by checking this result instead of Equals, and only use Equals when necessary.

The problem is that Julia Roberts plays two roles there: NET framework with version 2. It would be easy to extend it to also inspect public fields which would be a useful feature.


Empty is pointlessy wasteful, just exclude from the hash. First of all, we already know that we cant get rid of GetHashCode. Download source - In that case just return 1. You might also sometimes compare them based on Name. Courage a collection of lengthy notes on how I am usually coward to do what is wrong and how I am sometimes brave to do what is right.

Internally, a dictionary contains an array of buckets, where values can be stored.